There was no physical violence, and that does not weaken your case.It changes what your case is made of. Yours is proven by pattern, and a pattern only exists if someone writes it down.
Psychological and emotional abuse is family violence under s. 1 of the Family Law Act — intimidation, harassment, coercion, threats, unreasonable restrictions on your financial or personal autonomy, following you, damaging your things. It counts whether or not he meant to harm you. A pattern of coercive and controlling behaviour is something a judge is required to consider when deciding on a protection order.
But a physical case comes with photographs and hospital records. Yours does not. What you have instead is twenty or thirty specific things that happened on specific days, which together form a shape anyone can recognise. Written down, that is evidence. Held only in your memory, it is a feeling you are trying to describe.
Because he will. Everything filed with the court gets served on him. This one constraint will keep out the venting and the exaggeration, and both of those would cost you far more than they could ever gain you.
Do not write that he was abusive, controlling, or a narcissist. Write what he said and what he did, and let whoever reads it reach that conclusion on their own. They will. Characterisations get discounted; specifics do not.
If a single line can be shown to be overstated, everything else on the page gets read with suspicion. Understate if you are unsure. If you cannot remember whether it was twice or five times, write "at least twice."
Petty grievances sitting next to serious incidents make the serious ones look smaller. If it would not matter to a stranger, leave it out.
Nobody can recall this on demand. Go through these one at a time and something will surface for most of them.
These are the concrete part of your file. Everything else establishes the pattern; these are the incidents a judge can act on immediately. Give them more detail than anything else in the document.
For each one: the date as closely as you can fix it, whether he was solely responsible for Maple at the time, what you actually observed — speech, balance, the state of him, how long it lasted — what you did, and whether anyone else saw it.
The two occasions involving the bag need to be exact. Where it was found. That Maple picked it up and brought it to you. What he said when you raised it. What you did with it. Write these as though they are the only two paragraphs anyone will read, because they may be.
Do not go and get evidence. Nothing on this list is worth going back to that house for, and nothing on it is worth taking a photograph of something in his possession. Write down what you already saw. That is admissible and it is enough.
One person who can say "she told me about this in July 2025" is worth more than four pages of your own recollection. Go through your phone and pull anything that survives — texts to your mother or your sister, messages where you cancelled plans, anything you wrote at the time.
If you ever mentioned any of it to a doctor, a nurse, a counsellor, or a public health nurse at one of Maple's appointments, say so and note roughly when. Those records exist, they are dated, and they carry real weight precisely because nobody made them for a court.
This is a raw working document, not a court document. It can be messy, out of order, and full of things that later get cut. Someone at the Justice Access Centre or duty counsel will help you turn the strongest ten or fifteen entries into the version that gets filed. So do not try to write it well. Just get it out.
Do it in short stretches, half an hour at most, with someone else in the room or in the house. Not late at night, and not alone. Start with the last twelve months, because that is what you remember most clearly and what matters most, and work backwards only if you have the energy.
You are not writing this to prove that it was bad enough. You are writing it because the pattern is the evidence, and right now it only exists in your head.